Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinigami (Death Note)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Death Note characters. MBisanz ^talk 01:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Shinigami (Death Note)

Shinigami (Death Note) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a mostly in-universe article that fails to establish notability. While there is the conception section, it's filled only by primary sources. TTN (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

• Redirect or merge to List of Death Note characters. Most of these are really, really minor characters. Sro23 (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
• Redirect or merge to List of Death Note characters per Sro23 comments. Aoba47 (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
• Merge to Shinigami, where it is already listed as a popular culture instantiation. Jclemens (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Death Note characters per above. If any of the Shinigami mentioned in this article are not already in that list, a selective merge is possible, but as most of the characters that fit this criteria are extremely minor characters, I would not personally recommend it.64.183.45.226 (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

• No redirect or deletion There are many characters in this article which is not included in List of Death Note characters.So,I think this article is important.Rudra Protap Chackraborty (talk) 10:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.